Has anyone else been impressed by the way "Juror #1" handles himself. Seems like a thoughtful and intelligent fellow. Heaven forbid I ever find myself on trial for a crime, I hope the "jury of my peers" includes someone like this guy.
Has anyone else been impressed by the way "Juror #1" handles himself. Seems like a thoughtful and intelligent fellow. Heaven forbid I ever find myself on trial for a crime, I hope the "jury of my peers" includes someone like this guy.
Pete Hanlin, ABOM
Vice President Professional Services
Essilor of America
http://linkedin.com/in/pete-hanlin-72a3a74
oh man... lol
Originally Posted by Spexvet
Actually Pete, the whole jury performed well. After my initial shock and short outburst of anger (where there's smoke, there's fire IMO) I had a chance to listen to Mr Rodrigues (sp) and he made a lot of sense....even while being harrassed by the abrasive and under intelligent Nancy Grace. The job of the jury is to weigh the evidence, NOT their opinions, and come to a conclusion. He said, and from what little I know, the prosecution did not proove its case. One juror last night said he thought Jackson was a molester because of the case in the 90's, but the prosecution didn't provide enough evidence for a conviction in this case. He also said the mother of the molestee had little creditability.Originally Posted by Pete Hanlin
I think the system worked the way it was supposed to.... so the weirdo walks. I hope he has the courtesy of laying low for the next 50 years or so, so we see as little of him as we do OJ and Blake.
"Always laugh when you can. It is a cheap medicine"
Lord Byron
Take a photo tour of Cape Cod and the Islands!
www.capecodphotoalbum.com
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks