Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: The Canadian Sponsership Scandal

  1. #1
    One of the worst people here
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Occupation
    Other Eyecare-Related Field
    Posts
    8,331

    The Canadian Sponsership Scandal

    Here is a timeline of what has happened:

    CBC.CA

    Not since Canada was a mere six years old has a sitting prime minister given testimony before a public inquiry.

    On Feb. 8, 2005, former prime minister Jean Chrétien appeared before the Gomery Inquiry. He vigorously defended the federal sponsorship as an important part of the battle against Quebec sovereigntists in the wake of the 1995 referendum.

    Mistakes were made, he conceded, and people who stole money should be punished.

    Two days later, Prime Minister Paul Martin – the man who called the inquiry – gave his testimony. He appeared a year to the day after he ordered the inquiry into the sponsorship program.

    The scandal has been the talk of Ottawa since 2002, when federal Auditor General Sheila Fraser recommended the RCMP investigate how $1.6 million in federal government advertising contracts were handed out to a Montreal ad agency.

    There had been rumours that a government advertising and sponsorship program set up to promote unity in the wake of the 1995 referendum in Quebec, was little more than a vehicle to reward loyal Liberal supporters. The fund was run by the Public Works Department, headed by then Prime Minister Chrétien's Quebec lieutenant, Alphonso Gagliano.

    On Feb. 10, 2004, Fraser released her audit of the program.

    She found that $100 million was paid to a variety of communications agencies in the form of fees and commissions and said the program was basically designed to generate commissions for these companies rather than to produce any benefit for Canadians.

    Officials in Canada's Public Works Department "broke just about every rule in the book" when it came to awarding contracts to Groupaction Inc., Fraser said.

    ------

    Oct. 30, 1995: The Quebec referendum ends with the No side winning by a narrow margin. Shortly after, the federal government begins a pro-federalism advertising campaign to boost its profile in the province. Groupaction Marketing Inc. is one of the advertising agencies chosen for the contracts.

    May 1, 1999: The federal government issues a $615,000 contract to Groupaction to report on whether the government is getting its money's worth from its sponsorship of hunting, fishing and other recreational events. Those sponsorship deals were handled entirely by Groupaction. The company later produces a 20-page report listing projects that are looking for government money.

    Aug. 26, 2000: Public Works Minister Alfonso Gagliano comes under fire for awarding contracts to advertising companies, including Groupaction, which subcontracted their printing business to Lithographie Dickson, a company that hired Gagliano's son, Vincenzo, as its director of marketing and business development in 1999.

    Oct. 11, 2000: An August 2000 internal audit appears on the Public Works Department website indicating the government is not keeping a close watch over the advertising agencies responsible for sponsoring sporting and cultural events. Groupaction is one of those agencies.

    May 23, 2001: Federal Ethics Counsellor Howard Wilson releases a report clearing Gagliano of any conflict of interest in awarding contracts to the advertising companies that subcontracted their printing business to his son's company.

    Jan. 15, 2002: After a major cabinet shuffle, Prime Minister Jean Chrétien appoints Gagliano ambassador to Denmark. Opposition leaders call it a patronage appointment for a longtime Chrétien loyalist.

    March 12, 2002: Neither newly-appointed Public Works Minister Don Boudria nor Groupaction can find a report worth $550,000 that should have been delivered in February 1999. Boudria says the study may never turn up. The report was to have suggested ways for the government to improve its visibility at cultural and sporting events.

    March 19, 2002: The missing report is found, but it's nearly identical to another report delivered to the government in October 1999 at a cost of $575,000. Both reports evaluated the impact of government sponsorships of recreation, hunting and fishing events. Both documents contain the same spelling errors, while the later report contains recommendations for events that had already taken place. Boudria places the blame on Gagliano, his predecessor in the post.

    March 20, 2002: Boudria calls for an audit of the two reports by Groupaction. He says the auditor general will have the option of asking for a refund or bringing in the RCMP to investigate. A committee looking into Gagliano's qualifications as a new ambassador doesn't allow any questions about his 25 years in politics.

    May 8, 2002: Auditor General Sheila Fraser releases a report saying federal bureaucrats broke "just about every rule in the book" in their dealings with the marketing firm Groupaction. The RCMP will look into $1.6 million in federal contracts awarded to the Montreal advertising firm.

    May 20-24, 2002: Public Works Minister Don Boudria is roasted for spending a ski weekend with his family at the luxury country home of Quebec advertising executive Claude Boulay of Groupe Everest.

    May 21, 2002: The public hears that Groupe Polygone, a Quebec company, received almost $40 million in government sponsorship contracts in the past five years.

    May 26, 2002: Art Eggleton loses his job as defence minister in a surprise cabinet shuffle due to allegations of conflict of interest. John McCallum, the junior finance minister, becomes minister of national defence. Boudria says there might be a perception that he crossed a line and is pleased to be back as government House leader. Ralph Goodale becomes Canada's third public works minister in roughly four months.

    May 27, 2002: Opposition leaders renew their calls for an independent ethics counsellor.

    May 29, 2002: Public Works Minister Ralph Goodale says that RCMP officers are looking at more files from his department and that new files had been referred to the police.

    Sept. 17, 2002: RCMP raids the offices of Groupaction in Montreal; removes files and documents.

    Oct. 23, 2002: Prime Minister Chrétien unveils a new ethics package that includes a new code of conduct for MPs and requires lobbyists to disclose more information.

    April 28, 2003: Public Works Minister Ralph Goodale announces Ottawa's new federal advertising policies. They include:

    * A stipulation that 80 per cent of advertising work be done in Canada by Canadians, replacing a previous rule requiring that all work be Canadian.
    * An increase in the number of suppliers eligible to bid on government contracts.
    * The introduction of independent fairness monitors to help with the bid process.
    * A switch from paying on a per-commission basis to hourly rates, a policy that will be reviewed within 24 months.
    * The issuance of an annual report on federal advertising activity.

    Sept. 15, 2003: Parliament resumes, weeks before Liberals will elect new leader at November convention. Opposition repeats calls for judicial inquiry into sponsorship program, demands recall of Ambassador Gagliano from Denmark. Public Works Minister Goodale says the government has "toughened rules and procedures" and stopped doing business with the firms in question.

    Nov. 13, 2003: Two days before federal Auditor General Sheila Fraser is to release her report on the federal sponsorship program, Chrétien prorogues Parliament; his October 2002 ethics bill dies on the order paper.

    Dec. 12, 2003: Paul Martin sworn in as prime minister; appoints Stephen Owen new minister of public works. Goodale becomes finance minister.

    Dec. 13, 2003: On his first day as prime minister, Paul Martin cancels advertising sponsorship program. Martin also announces Communications Canada, the arm of the Public Works Department responsible for the troubled program, will wind down by March 2004.

    Jan. 26, 2004: A Globe and Mail report says officials from the auditor general's office travelled to Denmark to interview Gagliano. It's an unusual move for the auditor general, who rarely interviews politicians in investigations
    These are my beliefs:

    1. Jean Chreiten is at fault
    2. A small group of Liberals are at fault
    3. The Liberal party itself it not at fault
    4. Paul Martin is not at fault
    5. There should be no election until the Gomery investigation is finished

    We know that a group of Liberals and Chreiten were involved. However, issues like this tend to be only limited to a small group. A lot of people say that since Martin was Finance Minister during the period that he knew. Well that would be like saying a share-holder knows when something is going wrong in the company, because the shareholder saw the financial statements. The Finance Minister see the contributions and decides which divisions of Canada should get money, in addition to many different things; however, he or she does not see who gave the money and all the tiny little transactions. Additionally, Chreiten and Martin never really got along.

    I think that to have an election before the Gomery investigation is done would be a grave injustice, because it is declaring someone guilty before proving it.

    If there was an election today I would vote Liberal. Here are my reasons why:

    1. I believe that the Conservatives will spit on our Canadian values and escalate the debt of the nation.
    2. I believe that by voting Liberal it is the only way to prevent Conservative leadership.
    3. I belive that the Conservative policies are too similar to the American Republican policy, which I am very against (no offense to fellow Americans. I am bashing the GOP, not the Americans).
    4. I believe that the Liberal party is the only party in Canada that could efficiently run our economy, health-care system, education systems, and government as a whole.
    5. I believe that Paul Martin can do more good for the nation if he is allowed to do so.
    6. The Conservatives ran into a scandal the last time it was in power, and it would be ignorant to think otherwise.
    7. The sponsership scandal was a great misgiving for Canada; however, after 12 years of leadership under the Liberals we as a nation remain one of the least corrupt nations in the World (folks that includes the scandal. I know the US has had worse situations recently than us and they are not worrying about it), and rated as one of the best countries to live in.
    8. The NDP is great, but its policies are still going to run us into debt.
    9. The Conservatives will put a further crease into national unity.

  2. #2
    Rising Star Monkeysee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Occupation
    Ophthalmic Technician
    Posts
    103
    **sigh**
    political scandals, the seal hunt, Molson Canadian breweries bought up by Coors USA, heinous serial killers being released from prison, (and an extremely gruesome one about to go on trial in B.C.).

    O Canada!

    I remember my grandmother always used to watch the nightly news reports from the U.S. because Canada's news was so BORING....
    Chimperial Optical-what a great place to work!

  3. #3
    One of the worst people here
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Occupation
    Other Eyecare-Related Field
    Posts
    8,331
    Boring news is not necessarily a bad thing. But I understand your point and I somewaht agree with it.

  4. #4
    Optical Curmudgeon EyeManFla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Smithfield, North Carolina
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,340
    "Blame Canada, blame Canada"! Time for Canada to call it a day. We could use a few more stars on the Flag.
    "Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde"

  5. #5
    One of the worst people here
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Occupation
    Other Eyecare-Related Field
    Posts
    8,331
    Quote Originally Posted by EyeManFla
    "Blame Canada, blame Canada"! Time for Canada to call it a day. We could use a few more stars on the Flag.
    Never

  6. #6
    OptiBoard Professional
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Occupation
    Consumer or Non-Eyecare field
    Posts
    168
    Quote Originally Posted by For-Life
    Boring news is not necessarily a bad thing.
    Old chinese curse: may you live in interesting times.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Canadian Federal Election June 28, 2004
    By For-Life in forum Just Conversation
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 06-15-2004, 09:26 AM
  2. Canada can "boo" all night long...
    By Johns in forum Just Conversation
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-26-2003, 02:41 PM
  3. 20/20 Marketing Ltd. Becomes Live Eyewear Canadian Distributor
    By Newsroom in forum Optical Industry News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-03-2002, 02:28 PM
  4. Ocular Sciences Lawsuit Against Canadian E-Retailers
    By Joann Raytar in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-03-2002, 01:36 AM
  5. Fao: Canadian Opticians
    By Optom in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-19-2001, 07:25 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •