I am passionate about justice and what the COO did was reprehensible and justice is required. The amount of money is not the point but rather a finding that results in correcting what was done to two...
Type: Posts; User: Revelation; Keyword(s):
I am passionate about justice and what the COO did was reprehensible and justice is required. The amount of money is not the point but rather a finding that results in correcting what was done to two...
Racial slurs are not trivial in the 21st century even if you think they are. However, this case is about 3 counts of defamation and conspiracy. In defamation, the plaintiff does not have to do...
First off, I'm not the plaintiff and I really doubt if the plaintiff needs any support. This is a matter that is before the courts and the court will decide. In the appearances in court so far, the...
People might find this of interest - scroll down a bit
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/marvin-ross/self-regulation-health-professionals_b_15211826.html?utm_hp_ref=canada-politics&ir=Canada+Politics
This has absolutely nothing to do with being a fan or not. It has to do with justice and what is right. Jay and Chris have both been defamed by the college and some of its officials. In addition, Jay...
Partly right if that had been done 4 years ago. If you get a notice of action as the college did then the sensible thing to do is to contact the lawyer and resolve it before it goes too far - an...
The legal action against the college is for 3 counts of defamation plus conspiracy. Defamation in Canada is unique. There is a reverse onus which means that Jay and Chris do not have to prove they...
Sadly I don't as I think you have to request them from the court but people should ask council what happened when they tried to have the claim by Jay and Chris thrown out of court. And they should...
Agree with idispense. All of this is shocking but this is only a preliminary. The College went to court to try to have the main case thrown out and lost. the judge agreed there were grounds. Then the...
Up to now, there has been little to report as the College is dragging its feet. The normal process is for both parties to disclose documents to each other and then move to discovery where the lawyers...
The conclusion to be drawn from this is that the College either does not take this legal action against itself seriously and they are stupid enough to fail to comply with the orders from a judge....
Yes I meant the plaintiffs as the college ignored the judges orders.
When the college brought a motion to dismiss most of the statement of claim against it, the judge ordered the plaintiffs to makes some minor changes and to file a revised claim within 7 days. He then...
The lawyer for the College had filed a motion ages ago to have most of the statement of claim for defamation filed by Jay and Chris tossed out and the case was heard yesterday.
It did not go well...
What confidential document? A Statement of Claim is a public document and anyone can get it if they go to the courthouse and request it.
http://www.cfact.ca/StatementofClaim.pdf
Details of Claim Against College of Opticians of Ontario
cfact.ca/StatementofClaim.pdf