Here's my solution (albeit vague).
What you need to be able to do is close up the space at the top of the frames/lenses as much as possible. To start, a wraparound (6-base at least) would help the...
Type: Posts; User: cjdavis; Keyword(s):
Here's my solution (albeit vague).
What you need to be able to do is close up the space at the top of the frames/lenses as much as possible. To start, a wraparound (6-base at least) would help the...
The trickiest part (as I see it) would be getting the top rim of the frame high enough to not occlude vision with the head down, looking along the cue. Without having an exceedingly deep lens (as per...
I've had a few patients who've worn specs for 'cue sports', and generally I solve their problems case-by-case. The products you're looking for don't have as much of an appeal as you think they do.
...
Yeah, I've had this. When you explain that you can't get them to fit on their face AND on top of their head - and they say - "They're on my head most of the time, so I'd rather they stayed up there."
Perhaps this is my poor poor brain not working, is it possible she has previously been fitted with spherical 1.67s, and doesn't like the 'new' peripheral distortion?
It's always 'the best' when they forget to tell you they're wearing their contacts, and are confused when the glasses feel 'too strong'...
EDIT: To the OP, is the Px wearing spheric or aspheric?
Sounds like you're describing the same things to me...
Essilor 'e' followed by an X is most definitely a Comfort Ormex with Transitions. You're looking at a 1.56 index lens. Very brittle, wouldn't put it in a supra.
This is according to laramyk.