Essilor Transitions Crizal "cracking"?
I came across this board quite by accident while researching options for my new glasses, and since you appear to be a smart bunch, maybe someone can satisfy my curiosity :)
I've been wearing a set of Transitions Crizal for the last 3 years, and have been relatively happy with them. I have however noticed what appears to be a very fine grid of hairline "cracks" when the lens is viewed from the back - and these have progressively worsened as the lenses aged.
My guess is that these are microfine cracks in the AR coating because of heat expansion of the lens material, but this is obviously just a guess...
Does this happen to Crizal coatings (or any AR coatings for that matter) when exposed to heat? Could the heat from e.g. a BBQ cause this to happen or from washing under too-warm water?
I'm considering getting similar lenses for my new spectacles and would therefore like to know what caused this and if it is because of misuse (e.g. can be avoided) or simply because of old age.
Thanks a stack!
Characteristics of heat crazed Crizal coating. Can it be polished off?
I have crizal lenses that underwent an intriguing variation of stress cracking due to moderate heat from a barbecue:angry:. The temperature didn't feel any hotter to the facial skin than a summer day in Seattle, nevertheless it was apparently enough to craze frontal surface of my one of my lenses. It is intriguing though because the crazing isn't simple cracks on the surface, characteristic of other AR coated lenses I've worked with. It appears the "cracks" are actually linear "wrinkles" formed by the coating. When observing them from a deep lateral angle, there are no reflective facets indicative of a hairline cracks as is common to ESC of many plastics. Instead, there is a micro "warbling" of the optical image immediately approaching and retreating from the lines. Macroscopically, the effect would be similar to one putting water on a piece of glass and laying saran wrap over it without trapping any air. The saran wrap could then be moved around to wrinkle on the surface with water underneath forming a mesh of opticaly distorting linear menisci, except that on the lenses the "wrinkles" are approximately .001" high, with a similar radius of meniscus on either side. I would speculate it is partly because of my -3.5 sphere that my lenses crazed at the optical center where the local mass (and total heat capacitance) are the least. Only one lense was affected and the affected area has an approximate 8mm radius about the optical center. I'm curious if anyone has had success trying to polish off or buff out the surface anomalies.